Barrett Ch. 3 Interpreting photographs for 9/30
- What is the author’s thesis?
The author wants to inform others on how to interpret photos, and explain that there are many styles to interpret one photograph. Not everyone’s interpretation will be the same, that’s what makes photography so interesting.
- What examples does he use to support the thesis?
Barrett explains interpretation using an interpretation written bySusan Sontag about a Jeff Wall photograph. Sontag goes in depth and interprets every aspect of the photo to analyze it and understand more about the intention of the photograph.
- In your own words, how does Barrett define interpretation?
Analyzing a photograph to grasp the sense of what the photo conveys to the individual. Everyone's interpretation will differ because of different life experiences, therefore one’s interpretation of a photograph is of value.
- According to Barrett, why is interpretation important in criticism of photographs?
Interpretation is important in criticism of photographs because they offer a new language to the photograph going beyond description. They form interesting relationships and meanings about the photograph, which generates conversation about that said photograph.
- In Chapter 3 Barrett gives examples of various interpretations from different “interpretive perspectives” and “interpretive strategies” - choose one that stood out, surprised you, or interested you in some way and discuss why.
Intentionalist interpretation stood out to me because it is interesting to get a perspective from the maker of the photograph. If people did not know the artist’s intentions about the piece their interpretations are not invalid, however the artist may not have articulated enough in the photography for an audience to understand the work.
- In your own words, what is/are the main point(s) the author is trying to make in the section “‘Right’ Interpretations”?
No interpretation is considered wrong or incorrect, however some interpretations may be more articulated and detailed than others. Other interpretations offer new perspectives about a photograph, and they also are no “incorrect” interpretations.
- In your own words, what is/are the main point(s) the author is trying to make in the section “Interpretations and the Artist’s Intent”?
Sometimes the artist doesn’t even know the true intention about his/her photograph. Also, the artist's intentions can be interpreted. When an artist shares their intentions, the audience’s interpretations can vary or stay the same.
- Write about two other key points that you learned from this week’s reading.
One key point in the reading is interpretations and feelings. Interpretations and feelings are what you feel after/when you look at a photograph. Not holding back feelings about the photograph helps to learn what the artist’s intentions was when making the piece. Another key point is interpret, meaning, and personal significance. The meaning of a photograph is more subjective than the significance. The significance of a photograph is how the photograph affects individuals.
- Summarize - what is the author’s conclusion?
Interpretations need to articulate some sort of knowledge to be considered “correct” interpretations. Analyzing and interpreting photographs in an organized manner enables others converse about photographs and get others talking more about photographs.